Nancy Kissel’s Retrial Adjourned After Murder Suspect’s Outburst - anal sex products
by:KISSTOY
2020-04-16
Nancy Kissel was re-examined for murdering her Merrill Lynch.
The banker's husband is out of court today because she screams repeatedly and says she can "see" him at the intersection
Reviewed by the prosecution.
Judge Andrew McRae announced the adjournment one hour in advance.
Kissel stood up, cried in the direction of the jury, and was then bound by three female prison officials, and one of her lawyers, Amanda Clift, comforted --
Matthews and her mother, Jean mcgross Lin.
Prosecution attorney David Perry asked Kissel if she was lying about the marital status or if her allegations of abuse were a lie.
He showed her a photo of a family holiday a year before the incident and asked if she had been "acting ". ”The Michigan-
Earlier this week, the mothers of the three children testified in court, telling jurors that she had been physically and sexually abused before the November killing of Robert Keith. 2, 2003.
Perry told Kissel that she did not tell anyone before she was charged with the murder of November 2003 that her husband drank alcohol or forced her to anal sex.
Kissel sobbed and replied, "I know it's wrong for some of the things my husband did, but I compromised . ".
She said in tears that she could not tell anyone that her face was hurt, Perry said, "Madam
You didn't tell anyone, Kissel, because it's not true.
The accused began to scream in the stands and ignored McRae's attempt to speak to her. “I can see him.
He's on the floor, "Kissel told Clift-
Matthews pointed to me.
The judge removed the court and asked Kissel's mother and lawyer to comfort her.
He then ordered an extension to Monday.
The prosecutor dismissed Kissel's plea for manslaughter and accused her of plotting a beating and beating him to death.
Her defense stated that she was suffering from mental illness and was angered.
Kissel testified earlier today that on the night of the incident, her husband told her that he had filed a divorce application and he told the lawyer that she had a problem and that he would take the child away.
She also said he had a baseball bat.
"He leaned against it and threw it into the air.
Kissel said she didn't understand why he had bats, and she picked up lead decorations from the restaurant before heading towards him into the bedroom.
She said that he then forcibly had anal intercourse with her, during which she reached out to get the decorations, swayed it back and hit his forehead.
Then her husband said he would kill her and she answered the question of another lawyer, Edward fitzgerrard, telling the jury.
"I just kept rocking and didn't describe the sequence of events in more detail," she said . ".
Hong Kong SAR government V.
Nancy Ann Kissel, HCCC55/2010, first instance of the High Court of Hong Kong.